Review



ror1-pe  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems ror1-pe
    A) <t>ROR1</t> Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to isotype (ΔMFI) of non t(1;19) and t(1;19) translocated B-ALL samples. Translocated patient derived cells show specific ROR1 expression (n = 3, p = 0.0002, mean difference in MFI 403.3 ± 48.04). Histograms show representative surface ROR1 expression in t(1:19) translocated and non t(1:19) B-ALL patient derived CD19 cells. B) ROR1 Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to isotype (ΔMFI) of non t(1;19) (NALM-6, RS4;11) and t(1;19) translocated (697) B-ALL cell lines. t(1;19) translocated cells show specific ROR1 expression (n = 3, p = <0.0001, mean increase in MFI 697 vs NALM-6 = 2528, 697 vs RS4;11 = 2591). C) Representative histograms showing ROR1 expression on 697 cells but not non t(1;19) NALM-6 and RS4;11 cells as detected by flow cytometry. D) Scheme depicting preparation and expected action of ROR1 targeting immunoliposomes encapsulating OSU-2S (2A2-OSU-2S-ILP). E) Representative analysis of size and concentration of 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis by NanoSight. Mean size was 186.9 +/− 0.8nm, mean concentration was 1.2×1013 +/− 1.05 × 1011 particles/ml. F) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs mediate selective cytotoxicity in ROR1 + 697 cells as compared to IgG-OSU-2S-ILP (n = 8, p < 0.0001, mean decrease in viability 61.62%). G) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs mediate selective cytotoxicity in ROR1 + t(1:19) primary ALL cells as compared to IgG-OSU-2S-ILP and Empty ILPs (n = 3, p = 0.0174, mean decrease in viability 35.14%). H) No significant relative cytotoxicity was observed with 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs in ROR1- non t(1;19) cell line (NALM-6) and B-ALL primary cells. I) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILP significantly reduced tumor burden in the bone marrow of treated mice as compared to IgG control as detected by human CD45+/CD19+cells [p = 0.022, n = 5 (IgG-OSU-2S-ILP), n = 6 (2A2-OSU-2S-ILP), mean decrease = 1.751 ± 0.6372 × 106 cells. J) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILP (n = 9) treatment significantly improves survival in 697 CDX model as compared to (n = 6) IgG-OSU-2S-ILP (p = 0.013) and (n = 5) 2A2-Empty-ILP (p = 0.0044) treated mice.
    Ror1 Pe, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ror1-pe/product/R&D Systems
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ror1-pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "ROR1 targeted immunoliposomal delivery of OSU-2S shows selective cytotoxicity in t(1;19)(q23; p13) translocated B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia"

    Article Title: ROR1 targeted immunoliposomal delivery of OSU-2S shows selective cytotoxicity in t(1;19)(q23; p13) translocated B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Journal: Leukemia research

    doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106872

    A) ROR1 Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to isotype (ΔMFI) of non t(1;19) and t(1;19) translocated B-ALL samples. Translocated patient derived cells show specific ROR1 expression (n = 3, p = 0.0002, mean difference in MFI 403.3 ± 48.04). Histograms show representative surface ROR1 expression in t(1:19) translocated and non t(1:19) B-ALL patient derived CD19 cells. B) ROR1 Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to isotype (ΔMFI) of non t(1;19) (NALM-6, RS4;11) and t(1;19) translocated (697) B-ALL cell lines. t(1;19) translocated cells show specific ROR1 expression (n = 3, p = <0.0001, mean increase in MFI 697 vs NALM-6 = 2528, 697 vs RS4;11 = 2591). C) Representative histograms showing ROR1 expression on 697 cells but not non t(1;19) NALM-6 and RS4;11 cells as detected by flow cytometry. D) Scheme depicting preparation and expected action of ROR1 targeting immunoliposomes encapsulating OSU-2S (2A2-OSU-2S-ILP). E) Representative analysis of size and concentration of 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis by NanoSight. Mean size was 186.9 +/− 0.8nm, mean concentration was 1.2×1013 +/− 1.05 × 1011 particles/ml. F) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs mediate selective cytotoxicity in ROR1 + 697 cells as compared to IgG-OSU-2S-ILP (n = 8, p < 0.0001, mean decrease in viability 61.62%). G) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs mediate selective cytotoxicity in ROR1 + t(1:19) primary ALL cells as compared to IgG-OSU-2S-ILP and Empty ILPs (n = 3, p = 0.0174, mean decrease in viability 35.14%). H) No significant relative cytotoxicity was observed with 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs in ROR1- non t(1;19) cell line (NALM-6) and B-ALL primary cells. I) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILP significantly reduced tumor burden in the bone marrow of treated mice as compared to IgG control as detected by human CD45+/CD19+cells [p = 0.022, n = 5 (IgG-OSU-2S-ILP), n = 6 (2A2-OSU-2S-ILP), mean decrease = 1.751 ± 0.6372 × 106 cells. J) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILP (n = 9) treatment significantly improves survival in 697 CDX model as compared to (n = 6) IgG-OSU-2S-ILP (p = 0.013) and (n = 5) 2A2-Empty-ILP (p = 0.0044) treated mice.
    Figure Legend Snippet: A) ROR1 Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to isotype (ΔMFI) of non t(1;19) and t(1;19) translocated B-ALL samples. Translocated patient derived cells show specific ROR1 expression (n = 3, p = 0.0002, mean difference in MFI 403.3 ± 48.04). Histograms show representative surface ROR1 expression in t(1:19) translocated and non t(1:19) B-ALL patient derived CD19 cells. B) ROR1 Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to isotype (ΔMFI) of non t(1;19) (NALM-6, RS4;11) and t(1;19) translocated (697) B-ALL cell lines. t(1;19) translocated cells show specific ROR1 expression (n = 3, p = <0.0001, mean increase in MFI 697 vs NALM-6 = 2528, 697 vs RS4;11 = 2591). C) Representative histograms showing ROR1 expression on 697 cells but not non t(1;19) NALM-6 and RS4;11 cells as detected by flow cytometry. D) Scheme depicting preparation and expected action of ROR1 targeting immunoliposomes encapsulating OSU-2S (2A2-OSU-2S-ILP). E) Representative analysis of size and concentration of 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis by NanoSight. Mean size was 186.9 +/− 0.8nm, mean concentration was 1.2×1013 +/− 1.05 × 1011 particles/ml. F) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs mediate selective cytotoxicity in ROR1 + 697 cells as compared to IgG-OSU-2S-ILP (n = 8, p < 0.0001, mean decrease in viability 61.62%). G) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs mediate selective cytotoxicity in ROR1 + t(1:19) primary ALL cells as compared to IgG-OSU-2S-ILP and Empty ILPs (n = 3, p = 0.0174, mean decrease in viability 35.14%). H) No significant relative cytotoxicity was observed with 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs in ROR1- non t(1;19) cell line (NALM-6) and B-ALL primary cells. I) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILP significantly reduced tumor burden in the bone marrow of treated mice as compared to IgG control as detected by human CD45+/CD19+cells [p = 0.022, n = 5 (IgG-OSU-2S-ILP), n = 6 (2A2-OSU-2S-ILP), mean decrease = 1.751 ± 0.6372 × 106 cells. J) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILP (n = 9) treatment significantly improves survival in 697 CDX model as compared to (n = 6) IgG-OSU-2S-ILP (p = 0.013) and (n = 5) 2A2-Empty-ILP (p = 0.0044) treated mice.

    Techniques Used: Fluorescence, Derivative Assay, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Concentration Assay



    Similar Products

    93
    Miltenyi Biotec anti ror1 pe
    Anti Ror1 Pe, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ror1 pe/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti ror1 pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bioss anti ror1 antibody
    Anti Ror1 Antibody, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ror1 antibody/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti ror1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Miltenyi Biotec anti ror1
    Anti Ror1, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ror1/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti ror1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Becton Dickinson pe anti-human ror1
    Pe Anti Human Ror1, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/pe anti-human ror1/product/Becton Dickinson
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pe anti-human ror1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Becton Dickinson pe mouse anti-human ror1

    Pe Mouse Anti Human Ror1, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/pe mouse anti-human ror1/product/Becton Dickinson
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pe mouse anti-human ror1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    R&D Systems ror1-pe
    A) <t>ROR1</t> Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to isotype (ΔMFI) of non t(1;19) and t(1;19) translocated B-ALL samples. Translocated patient derived cells show specific ROR1 expression (n = 3, p = 0.0002, mean difference in MFI 403.3 ± 48.04). Histograms show representative surface ROR1 expression in t(1:19) translocated and non t(1:19) B-ALL patient derived CD19 cells. B) ROR1 Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to isotype (ΔMFI) of non t(1;19) (NALM-6, RS4;11) and t(1;19) translocated (697) B-ALL cell lines. t(1;19) translocated cells show specific ROR1 expression (n = 3, p = <0.0001, mean increase in MFI 697 vs NALM-6 = 2528, 697 vs RS4;11 = 2591). C) Representative histograms showing ROR1 expression on 697 cells but not non t(1;19) NALM-6 and RS4;11 cells as detected by flow cytometry. D) Scheme depicting preparation and expected action of ROR1 targeting immunoliposomes encapsulating OSU-2S (2A2-OSU-2S-ILP). E) Representative analysis of size and concentration of 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis by NanoSight. Mean size was 186.9 +/− 0.8nm, mean concentration was 1.2×1013 +/− 1.05 × 1011 particles/ml. F) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs mediate selective cytotoxicity in ROR1 + 697 cells as compared to IgG-OSU-2S-ILP (n = 8, p < 0.0001, mean decrease in viability 61.62%). G) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs mediate selective cytotoxicity in ROR1 + t(1:19) primary ALL cells as compared to IgG-OSU-2S-ILP and Empty ILPs (n = 3, p = 0.0174, mean decrease in viability 35.14%). H) No significant relative cytotoxicity was observed with 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs in ROR1- non t(1;19) cell line (NALM-6) and B-ALL primary cells. I) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILP significantly reduced tumor burden in the bone marrow of treated mice as compared to IgG control as detected by human CD45+/CD19+cells [p = 0.022, n = 5 (IgG-OSU-2S-ILP), n = 6 (2A2-OSU-2S-ILP), mean decrease = 1.751 ± 0.6372 × 106 cells. J) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILP (n = 9) treatment significantly improves survival in 697 CDX model as compared to (n = 6) IgG-OSU-2S-ILP (p = 0.013) and (n = 5) 2A2-Empty-ILP (p = 0.0044) treated mice.
    Ror1 Pe, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ror1-pe/product/R&D Systems
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ror1-pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Miltenyi Biotec ror1-pe antibody
    Expression of surface markers (A) CCR7 (CCL19 receptor), CD29 and CD49d (VLA4 integrin subunits), (B) <t>ROR1</t> and CXCR4 (CXCL12 receptor), and CD11a and CD18 (LFA1 integrin subunits) in HG-3, MAVER-1, MEC-1, and MINO cells. Stained (red) and unstained control (blue) samples are shown as dot plots of fluorescence intensity. Three replicate measurements for each cell line are shown; for quantification, see . (C) Representative tSNE visualization of metaclusters automatically generated by FlowSOM of HG-3, MAVER-1, MEC-1, and MINO cells from one replicate shown in (A–B) . (D) tSNE visualization of cell line distribution. (E) Left: tSNE of the HG-3 cell line upon subtraction from the dataset shown in 5C. Right: heatmap resuming expression of individual markers in subclusters of the HG-3 cell line. (F) Left: tSNE of the MINO cell line upon subtraction from the dataset shown in 5C. Right: heatmap resuming expression of individual markers in subclusters of the MINO cell line.
    Ror1 Pe Antibody, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ror1-pe antibody/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ror1-pe antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Journal: Cell Reports Methods

    Article Title: Sequence enrichment profiles enable target-agnostic antibody generation for a broad range of antigens

    doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2023.100475

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: PE Mouse anti-Human ROR1 , BD Biosciences , Cat# 564474; RRID: AB_2738822.

    Techniques: Produced, Recombinant, Sequencing, Software

    A) ROR1 Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to isotype (ΔMFI) of non t(1;19) and t(1;19) translocated B-ALL samples. Translocated patient derived cells show specific ROR1 expression (n = 3, p = 0.0002, mean difference in MFI 403.3 ± 48.04). Histograms show representative surface ROR1 expression in t(1:19) translocated and non t(1:19) B-ALL patient derived CD19 cells. B) ROR1 Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to isotype (ΔMFI) of non t(1;19) (NALM-6, RS4;11) and t(1;19) translocated (697) B-ALL cell lines. t(1;19) translocated cells show specific ROR1 expression (n = 3, p = <0.0001, mean increase in MFI 697 vs NALM-6 = 2528, 697 vs RS4;11 = 2591). C) Representative histograms showing ROR1 expression on 697 cells but not non t(1;19) NALM-6 and RS4;11 cells as detected by flow cytometry. D) Scheme depicting preparation and expected action of ROR1 targeting immunoliposomes encapsulating OSU-2S (2A2-OSU-2S-ILP). E) Representative analysis of size and concentration of 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis by NanoSight. Mean size was 186.9 +/− 0.8nm, mean concentration was 1.2×1013 +/− 1.05 × 1011 particles/ml. F) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs mediate selective cytotoxicity in ROR1 + 697 cells as compared to IgG-OSU-2S-ILP (n = 8, p < 0.0001, mean decrease in viability 61.62%). G) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs mediate selective cytotoxicity in ROR1 + t(1:19) primary ALL cells as compared to IgG-OSU-2S-ILP and Empty ILPs (n = 3, p = 0.0174, mean decrease in viability 35.14%). H) No significant relative cytotoxicity was observed with 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs in ROR1- non t(1;19) cell line (NALM-6) and B-ALL primary cells. I) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILP significantly reduced tumor burden in the bone marrow of treated mice as compared to IgG control as detected by human CD45+/CD19+cells [p = 0.022, n = 5 (IgG-OSU-2S-ILP), n = 6 (2A2-OSU-2S-ILP), mean decrease = 1.751 ± 0.6372 × 106 cells. J) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILP (n = 9) treatment significantly improves survival in 697 CDX model as compared to (n = 6) IgG-OSU-2S-ILP (p = 0.013) and (n = 5) 2A2-Empty-ILP (p = 0.0044) treated mice.

    Journal: Leukemia research

    Article Title: ROR1 targeted immunoliposomal delivery of OSU-2S shows selective cytotoxicity in t(1;19)(q23; p13) translocated B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106872

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A) ROR1 Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to isotype (ΔMFI) of non t(1;19) and t(1;19) translocated B-ALL samples. Translocated patient derived cells show specific ROR1 expression (n = 3, p = 0.0002, mean difference in MFI 403.3 ± 48.04). Histograms show representative surface ROR1 expression in t(1:19) translocated and non t(1:19) B-ALL patient derived CD19 cells. B) ROR1 Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to isotype (ΔMFI) of non t(1;19) (NALM-6, RS4;11) and t(1;19) translocated (697) B-ALL cell lines. t(1;19) translocated cells show specific ROR1 expression (n = 3, p = <0.0001, mean increase in MFI 697 vs NALM-6 = 2528, 697 vs RS4;11 = 2591). C) Representative histograms showing ROR1 expression on 697 cells but not non t(1;19) NALM-6 and RS4;11 cells as detected by flow cytometry. D) Scheme depicting preparation and expected action of ROR1 targeting immunoliposomes encapsulating OSU-2S (2A2-OSU-2S-ILP). E) Representative analysis of size and concentration of 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis by NanoSight. Mean size was 186.9 +/− 0.8nm, mean concentration was 1.2×1013 +/− 1.05 × 1011 particles/ml. F) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs mediate selective cytotoxicity in ROR1 + 697 cells as compared to IgG-OSU-2S-ILP (n = 8, p < 0.0001, mean decrease in viability 61.62%). G) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs mediate selective cytotoxicity in ROR1 + t(1:19) primary ALL cells as compared to IgG-OSU-2S-ILP and Empty ILPs (n = 3, p = 0.0174, mean decrease in viability 35.14%). H) No significant relative cytotoxicity was observed with 2A2-OSU-2S-ILPs in ROR1- non t(1;19) cell line (NALM-6) and B-ALL primary cells. I) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILP significantly reduced tumor burden in the bone marrow of treated mice as compared to IgG control as detected by human CD45+/CD19+cells [p = 0.022, n = 5 (IgG-OSU-2S-ILP), n = 6 (2A2-OSU-2S-ILP), mean decrease = 1.751 ± 0.6372 × 106 cells. J) 2A2-OSU-2S-ILP (n = 9) treatment significantly improves survival in 697 CDX model as compared to (n = 6) IgG-OSU-2S-ILP (p = 0.013) and (n = 5) 2A2-Empty-ILP (p = 0.0044) treated mice.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies used include c-Myc, p21 and β-Actin (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), CD45-FITC, CD3-PE-Cy7, CD19-BV785 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), murine CD45-PECF594 (BD Biosciences) and ROR1- PE (R&D Systems).

    Techniques: Fluorescence, Derivative Assay, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Concentration Assay

    Expression of surface markers (A) CCR7 (CCL19 receptor), CD29 and CD49d (VLA4 integrin subunits), (B) ROR1 and CXCR4 (CXCL12 receptor), and CD11a and CD18 (LFA1 integrin subunits) in HG-3, MAVER-1, MEC-1, and MINO cells. Stained (red) and unstained control (blue) samples are shown as dot plots of fluorescence intensity. Three replicate measurements for each cell line are shown; for quantification, see . (C) Representative tSNE visualization of metaclusters automatically generated by FlowSOM of HG-3, MAVER-1, MEC-1, and MINO cells from one replicate shown in (A–B) . (D) tSNE visualization of cell line distribution. (E) Left: tSNE of the HG-3 cell line upon subtraction from the dataset shown in 5C. Right: heatmap resuming expression of individual markers in subclusters of the HG-3 cell line. (F) Left: tSNE of the MINO cell line upon subtraction from the dataset shown in 5C. Right: heatmap resuming expression of individual markers in subclusters of the MINO cell line.

    Journal: Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

    Article Title: Role of casein kinase 1 in the amoeboid migration of B-cell leukemic and lymphoma cells: A quantitative live imaging in the confined environment

    doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.911966

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression of surface markers (A) CCR7 (CCL19 receptor), CD29 and CD49d (VLA4 integrin subunits), (B) ROR1 and CXCR4 (CXCL12 receptor), and CD11a and CD18 (LFA1 integrin subunits) in HG-3, MAVER-1, MEC-1, and MINO cells. Stained (red) and unstained control (blue) samples are shown as dot plots of fluorescence intensity. Three replicate measurements for each cell line are shown; for quantification, see . (C) Representative tSNE visualization of metaclusters automatically generated by FlowSOM of HG-3, MAVER-1, MEC-1, and MINO cells from one replicate shown in (A–B) . (D) tSNE visualization of cell line distribution. (E) Left: tSNE of the HG-3 cell line upon subtraction from the dataset shown in 5C. Right: heatmap resuming expression of individual markers in subclusters of the HG-3 cell line. (F) Left: tSNE of the MINO cell line upon subtraction from the dataset shown in 5C. Right: heatmap resuming expression of individual markers in subclusters of the MINO cell line.

    Article Snippet: HG-3 cells were stained using the ROR1-PE antibody (cat. no. 130-098-317, Miltenyi Biotec) using the same staining protocol as described earlier.

    Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Fluorescence, Generated